Panelists Cool on Some Safety Tech
![]() | |
| More coverage | |
| |
![]() |
The mandated use of data recorders 鈥 black boxes 鈥 was a particularly thorny issue, as some panelists voiced concerns that information gathered by the devices could be used in litigation against truckers involved in an accident.
鈥淚 would hope the industry would fight [a black box mandate] tooth and nail,鈥 said John Smith, president of CRST International in Cedar Rapids, Iowa.
However, if black boxes are forced upon the industry, Smith said he would want their use limited. If the devices were used for accident investigations only and not for other purposes, they might be worth looking at, he said.
Smith cautioned that mandating black boxes would add costs without clear benefits.
table width="175" border="0" align="right" "vspace="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2">


Michael James - Transport Topics

鈥淭he government now seems poised to mandate recording devices, black boxes, that won鈥檛 make a nickel鈥檚 worth of difference in highway safety but will add thousands of dollars in new costs to trucks,鈥 he said. 鈥淲e don鈥檛 think a lot of the regulations can actually survive any kind of cost-benefit analysis, and the frustrating part of that is if it鈥檚 not going to survive cost-benefit, we鈥檙e not going to see any measurable improvement out there on the highway.鈥
鈥淲e certainly don鈥檛 believe [a black box] is any great or unique tool in accident investigation. I鈥檓 not talking about issues here where planes fall out of the sky, with no witnesses and no survivors, and there鈥檚 just rubble everywhere,鈥 Spencer said, referring to gains made in airline safety since black boxes were mandated for aircraft.
Roger Nober, general counsel of the House Transportation Committee, said the trucking industry may have to convince Congress that there is a compelling reason not to mandate black boxes. He said some congressmen don鈥檛 believe that having information about driver performance is a problem.
Walter B. McCormick Jr., president of American Trucking Associations, pointed out what he saw as a flaw in tax policy that discourages companies from investing in new technologies.
The excise tax system requires companies to pay a levy based on the cost of a truck, creating a disincentive to buy technologies that could improve safety or efficiency.
鈥淲hen trucking companies are able to purchase new technologies without having to also pay the government for purchasing those new technologies, the environment benefits, safety benefits, the economy benefits. So, we want to take a real look at excise tax relief from the context of a tax bill,鈥 McCormick said.
![]() Michael James - Transport Topics | ![]() |
| CRST Intl. President John M. Smith | ![]() |
鈥淚 think we鈥檝e got to let the marketplace make many of these decisions,鈥 Smith said. 鈥淚f a preponderance of people say this makes sense, and let鈥檚 go with it, fine, go ahead and mandate it for the few people who either can鈥檛 afford it or don鈥檛 want to afford it.鈥
Spencer added that he is skeptical of many new technologies. 鈥淚 don鈥檛 necessarily buy into the notion that just because you put something on a vehicle, it鈥檚 going to make it safer.鈥
![]() |
听




